Why did the revolution Fail? One key event in the state of affairs was the separation of the Social Democrats who became known as the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks in This was because some members of the what was to become the Bolsheviks, wanted to have a violent revolution, whereas the other members wanted to wait until the capitalist stage of the Marxist theory was complete as Russia was not ready for a proletarian revolution.
J The Dumas - Initial promises withdrawn: The composition of the Dumas The first Duma was made up largely of liberal and centrists - Kadets and Octobrists - as left-wing groups refused to participate.
However, this first Duma was also hostile to the government and made major demands for reform in terms of land reform and releasing political prisoners.
It was therefore dissolved by the Tsar after just 73 days. The second Duma was more representative, in that in included more members from both the extreme right and left. However, this led to these extremists using the Duma for their own propaganda, making it a loud and disruptive session of three and a half months before the government closed it down.
After the Tsar and Stolypin had recovered enough from to retreat further from the reforms of the October Manifesto and thus rigged the electoral system further in favour of the conservative forces of landowners at the expense of industrial workers. The third and fourth Dumas therefore represented mainly the propertied and middle classes, and hovered between reform and reaction.
Even though Nicholas was reluctant to co-operate with the Duma they managed to achieve some successes in this period in terms of social refoms. Faced with the immense challenges of WW1 Nicholas still refused to allow the Duma an active role in the war effort.
This led to a virtual alternative government emerging, and eventually a Duma plot to overthrow the Tsar! Yes, they represented an important constitutional step forwards because …. The Dumas were also able to pass some legislation for social progress: However, against this view, the Dumas should not be seen as a step forward because ….
Fundamentally, Nicholas still regarded the institution of the Duma with contempt, and not something that he should have to co-operate with.
This did not fit in with his worldview of autocratic rule! The government and Nicholas were still able to block any legislative issues proposed by the Dumas that it disliked. The representative nature of the dumas was severely limited both by the Fundamental Lawsand altering the electoral laws How far did the institution solve the long-term political problems of Russia?
On the one hand, granting the Duma after helped put the Tsar in a stronger position. The duma provided an arena in which the various political groups liberals, SD, SR could argue and become more divided.
In the final analysis, a stubborn and reactionary commitment to autocracy on behalf of Nicholas II prevented progress towards a more modern Russia, contributing directly to the February revolution.Jan 22, · Best Answer: The Revolution showed the fallibility of the army and of the Tsar - previously all Tsars had been mostly held up as semi-divine.
It showed that Russia was still way behind the industrial nations, and that her Imperial ambitions were at an end.
But the spark that lit the fuse for the revolution was Bloody benjaminpohle.com: Resolved. The Russian Revolution explores the events leading up to Lenin and the Bolsheviks' assumption of power. Students examine the political and economic conditions that led to the fall of the Tsar and explore the competing political ideologies in revolutionary-era Russia.
More Essay Examples on Russia Rubric.
During the revolution one reason as to why the revolution failed was due to the number of strikes done by industry workers - Why did the revolution in Russia fail Essay introduction? In February , , workers went on strike due to the response of the bloody Sunday, the strikes were organised by the unhappy workers and were not .
Why did Nicholas II survive the revolution, but lose his throne in the February/March revolution? To what extent was the revolution of Feb / March in Russia due to the nature of Tsarism and the policies of Nicholas II ()?
The 'optimists' argue that after the revolution Russia, in , was being peacefully reformed along Western lines, and that only the stresses created by the war made another revolution possible.
Why did the revolution in Russia fail? The Russian revolution in failed due to many reasons such as the government’s issues, public’s action, and the loyalty to the Tsar by the armed forces and many other reasons.